Training Claude on copyrighted books it purchased was fair use, but piracy wasn't, the judge ruled.

In a test case for the artificial intelligence industry, a federal judge has ruled that AI company Anthropic didn’t break the ...

The ruling in a case involving Amazon-backed Anthropic lends credibility to the notion that AI video generators that could ...

Judge William Alsup's ruling tosses part of a case filed against Anthropic by a group of authors, but leaves that AI firm ...

The ruling isn't a guarantee for how similar cases will proceed, but it lays the foundations for a precedent that would side ...

The AI firm downloaded over seven million pirated books to assemble its research library, internal emails revealed.

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late on Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its ...

Anthropic didn't violate U.S. copyright law when the AI company used millions of legally purchased books to train its chatbot ...

A judge ruled the Anthropic artificial intelligence company didn't violate copyright laws when it used millions of ...

A federal judge has sided with Anthropic in an AI copyright case, ruling that training — and only training — its AI models on ...

In his ruling, Alsup claimed that, by training its LLM without the authors’ permission, Anthropic did not infringe on ...

While the startup has won its "fair use" argument, it potentially faces billions of dollars in damages for allegedly pirating ...